Jazz
17-11-2004, 22:00
To bad it was only 50%.
I was hoping that the McCaw (absentee owner) and his crony Stan McCammon would at least lose controlling interest (meaning only have at most 49% left). McCammon is the one who got Burke out of there because he did not want to share the credit of turing the team around with Burke..... :shakehead
Anyways, here the article:
Local Italian businessman purchases 50% of the Canucks (http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Vancouver/2004/09/14/629380-cp.html)
I was hoping that the McCaw (absentee owner) and his crony Stan McCammon would at least lose controlling interest (meaning only have at most 49% left). McCammon is the one who got Burke out of there because he did not want to share the credit of turing the team around with Burke..... :shakehead
Anyways, here the article:
Local Italian businessman purchases 50% of the Canucks (http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Vancouver/2004/09/14/629380-cp.html)